Archive for the ‘T-Mobile G1 with Google’ Category

Review: Microsoft’s Bing has a smart presentation, but still far from Google in key ways

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Review: Microsoft’s Bing has a smart presentation, but still far from Google in key ways

Is Microsoft’s Bing really a better search engine? Since it debuted last month, it has earned praise for the smart way it presents results and how it lets users preview Web sites without clicking through to them.

Yet a closer look at its results reveals why loyal Yahoo users may not end up happy with the deal the company announced Wednesday, which calls for Bing to replace Yahoo Search.

ComScore Inc. says 19.6 percent of Web users go to Yahoo for their searches. Microsoft draws fewer, at 8.4 percent. That’s up just slighly from the 8 percent it captured before Bing launched at the start of June. It didn’t make a dent in Google’s commanding 65 percent market share.

I think I can see why. Not only is using Google such an ingrained habit that we talk of “googling” something, but also its technology is better in some key ways. I found Bing to be less comprehensive than Google and, surprisingly, Yahoo Search. It simply returns fewer results for a lot of search terms.

With common terms like “cars,” all the search engines return oodles of results. Yahoo reports 2.56 billion pages with that term. It doesn’t matter so much how many pages they report, as long as they give relevant results, and all do.

Then I tried to hunt for something purposely obscure, like background on the country manor that my sister is interested in buying. Google gave me 46 links, Yahoo 15. Bing supplied just six.

Of course, even in this kind of query you might not have time to look through every link. So if Bing has six and they’re good, that’s fine.

Yet in the country manor search and other cases, often at the fringes of what you’d expect the Internet to know, I found the most relevant results in Google and Yahoo only.

Years ago, search engines competed by citing their “index size” — basically, how many pages they had collected in their database. Google played this game too. But as Google grew to dominate the scene by presenting better results, Web users lost interest in the statistics. Google doesn’t make a big point of them anymore either, though it did say last year that it had more than 1 trillion Web pages catalogued.

Looking at results from Bing, it may be time to care about search index size again. That’s especially the case because in other respects, the top three engines are so similar as to be nearly indistinguishable. Nos. 2 and 3 have basically copied Google.

(more…)

Targeted Genetics on the brink; Firefox in Europe and more

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Targeted Genetics on the brink; Firefox in Europe and more

Struggling Seattle biotech Targeted Genetics today reported a fourth quarter loss of $10.8 million, more than double its loss for the same period in 2007. Revenues also declined to $2.2 million, with the company noting that it only has enough cash on the books to fund operations through June. The company said that it expects the stock — which has traded below $1 for the past year — to be delisted from the Nasdaq.

AuBeta Networks, a 9-year-old Seattle company that provided wide area network services to restaurants and retailers, has hit hard times and is in the process of selling its assets to Telekenex. In a letter to customers earlier this month, AuBeta CEO Ethan Hernandez apologized for service disruptions and said that the company is transitioning operations to San Francisco-based IP service provider Telekenex.

Amazon.com is marking the 3rd anniversary of its Simple Storage Service (S3) with a 3-month discount. The company is offering data transfer into S3 for 3 cents per GB (as opposed to the standard 10 cents per GB) between April and June. S3 — one of Amazon’s first cloud services — now stores over 52 billion objects, according to the company.

Pathway Medical, a Kirkland maker of medical equipment for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease, has announced a $40 million venture deal with participation from Forbion Capital Partners, HLM Venture Partners, Latterell Venture Partners and others.

(more…)

Safari 4 browser beta is innovative, fast, fun

Friday, February 27th, 2009

Safari 4 browser beta is innovative, fast, fun

Apple Inc.’s decision to offer a public beta of its new Safari 4 Web browser — available for Mac OS X and Windows XP and Vista — caught the tech world by surprise. Even more surprising are the number of innovative features it offers, including in-your-face browser interface advances, under-the-hood updates for notably speedy rendering performance, and open-standards compliance.

Among the features that users will notice right away are refined tabbed browsing, a new “Top Sites” display that shows your most-visited sites, a new way to search through browser history and bookmarks, and a modified tool bar that drops the reload button used to refresh Web pages. (Don’t worry; Apple has you covered when it comes to reloading pages.)

The changes to tabs and the Top Sites feature will naturally invite comparisons to Google’s Chrome, which was introduced last fall and is available only for Windows. Chrome, like the new Safari, also places multiple tabs at the top of a window and offers a similar gallery view of recent sites. But simply seeing Safari’s new interface as something cribbed from Chrome is a bit unfair; Apple has provided its own take on both concepts that seems inspired as much by the mobile version of Safari included on the iPhone and iPod Touch as by Google Inc.

And for a public beta — one that no one outside Apple knew was coming — Safari 4 seems stable. I’ve yet to come across any show-stoppers in regular use.

One of the most obvious new features — you can’t miss it when you first launch of Safari 4 — is a new “Top Sites” page, which is the default view for new windows and tabs. Top Sites offers a 3-D gallery view of what Safari thinks are your favorite Web sites. It chooses the sites, shown as thumbnails in a curved arc across the browser window, based on those you visit most often. The thumbnails are displayed in a grid, and you can choose how many Web pages are displayed: six, 12 or 24.

The thumbnails are freshly generated whenever Top Sites is displayed; they’re not just static thumbnails created from previous browser sessions. If sites are dynamic and update in real time, Top Sites will show you live updates of those sites as you watch. If sites include an RSS feed, Safari can alert you that new content is available with a star icon on the appropriate thumbnail. The overall effect is stunning and makes Top Sites look like something from a sci-fi movie or a thriller-inspired virtual control room. It’s graphically sharp and useful for a variety of online tasks, from watching a stock ticker to getting news headlines or blog updates.

Although the Top Sites feature is dynamically generated based on sites you frequent — and you’ll likely visit those sites even more, since they’re displayed every time you start up Safari 4 — you can customize the page by “pinning” sites in place to keep them from being displaced. You can also exclude a site from ever being displayed, no matter how often you visit it.

The biggest advantage to this feature is that if you regularly visit the same sites for updates, you can easily keep tabs on them first thing in the morning or throughout the day without having to bookmark them. And if you’re surfing along and want to get back to your Top Sites page, there’s a new checkerboard-like icon in the browser bar for one-click access.

The visual effect makes Top Sites cool, but the functionality is what makes it useful.

Tweaked tabs

A second feature that you’ll notice in Safari 4 is that tabs are now displayed as part of the title bar at the top of the browser window. This is the feature that seems most heavily influenced by Google Chrome, though it’s offered with an Apple flair. The design takes tabbed browsing in a direction it has been going in other Web browsers by making tabs more useful and accessible. At the same time, the minimalist approach reduces the amount of screen space required for tabbed browsing, a welcome touch on any machine with a smaller display.

One feature that I like immensely is that Apple included a visible, but inconspicuous, button at the right side of the title bar — it looks like a small plus sign — for creating new tabs. Doing so before required a key combination. Although this may seem like a minor change, it’s likely to get users who don’t know about the key combo — CMD-T — or who may never have tried tabs to give them a spin.

New tabs display with corners that can be used to rearrange them or pull them off into separate windows. It’s another tweak that takes an existing option and makes it more accessible to new and experienced users. In both approaches, it’s clear that Apple tried to provide new interface options that let users know features exist but don’t to make them too complex. It’s a smart balance between UI and usefulness that works. If you’re not a fan of this new approach to tabs, there are ways of reverting to earlier interface standards. (Whether these will remain in the final release isn’t clear).

Ironically, the new approach to tabs runs counter to much of Apple’s general trend for user interfaces. Title bars typically contain just that: a title, along with buttons for closing, minimizing and zooming windows. Whether this is a UI trick that Apple settled on specifically for Safari or it’s a sign of interface designs to come is unclear. No doubt, we’ll know more with the release later this year of Apple’s next operating system, Mac OS X 10.6, a.k.a. Snow Leopard.

The new address and search bar

In looking to minimize interface elements and focus more on the browser, Apple has trimmed the standard address bar a bit. The most notable change is that there’s no obvious Reload button and no blue progress bar. (The blue bar used to indicate a page was loading, and showed behind the URL in the address bar.) Instead, Safari borrows an interface tweak from its mobile cousin on the iPhone and iPod Touch: the Reload button is now built into the right side of the address bar. And the Add Bookmark button has been added to the left edge of the address bar.

Another notable change involves autocompletion in both the address bar and the search bar. The autocomplete feature in the address bar no longer relies solely on the URLs from your bookmarks and history; It’s also based on the titles of pages and common phrases they include. Autocompleted results are now grouped together based on whether they’re bookmarks or history results — and they include both the URL and the page title, with the title getting top billing and bolder text.

The search bar still searches Google, but it also now offers autocompletion. This is a new and useful feature for Safari, though it has been available in other browsers and on Google’s homepage for a while now. Still, it’s nice to see Apple add it to Safari.

(more…)

INSIDE MOBILE: Google Opens a New Front in the Mobile Platform Wars

Friday, February 27th, 2009

INSIDE MOBILE: Google Opens a New Front in the Mobile Platform Wars

What factors will have the greatest influence in determining the relative success of the mobile platform? Ultimately, the key to success will be the ability of the operating system and its core applications and services to facilitate integration and interoperation with other applications and services. Here, Knowledge Center mobile and wireless analyst Pete Dailey explains why.

There are several major players in the mobile platform wars, which includes the mobile operating system and core applications and services. Those major platform players include Research in Motion (RIM), Google, Microsoft, Symbian, Palm (and various Linux platforms under LiMo) and Apple, among others. It is forecasted that global sales of smartphones will reach nearly half a billion units in 2009, rising to approximately 1.3 billion units in 2014.

T-Mobile USA began selling the G1 in October 2008. The G1, manufactured by HTC, was the first commercially-available phone powered by Google’s Android operating system. The T-Mobile G1 was made available in the UK in November, and will be in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic and the Netherlands some time in this first quarter of 2009. In October 2008, Symbian was the global smartphone market share leader, with 62 percent of the smartphone platform market.

But, due to Nokia’s less-than-stellar penetration of the United States market, Symbian is a distant fourth: RIM (34 percent), Microsoft (29 percent), Apple (9 percent) and Symbian (8 percent). While Palm had approximately 13 percent share of the smartphone device market, Palm licenses both Windows Mobile and Access, so the share for the Palm operating system is lower than the Palm device market share. Apple has approximately tripled market share in the United States year-to-date.

With all these major smartphone platform players jockeying for position, and with the geometric growth of the smartphone market, ample opportunity remains for existing competitors as well as new entrants such as Google to gain market share.

What factors will have the greatest influence in determining the relative success of the mobile platform? I am persuaded that, ultimately, the key to success will be the ability of the operating system and its core applications and services to facilitate integration and interoperation with other applications and services.

In the case of the iPhone, the elegant design, the introduction of a powerful new man-machine-interface (multi-touch), the full-HTML browser, and the iconic brand helped spur such feverish adoption initially. But I believe that the most important factor in the success of the iPhone has been the ability of iTunes to sync applications such as e-mail, contacts, calendar, music and video content. It is estimated that there have been 600 million downloads of iTunes, thus making it one of the most successful applications in history. And with MobileMe, Apple extends syncing to both the Internet and to the iPhone wirelessly.

Subsequently, when Apple added support for Microsoft ActiveSync, it built a bridge to tens of millions of enterprise users so they could receive their Exchange e-mail. The launch of the App Store and the cultivation of the developer community reinforce the role that the iPhone fills as hub of users’ digital lifestyle. The proof is in the numbers: Apple recently reported that over 100 million applications have been downloaded from the AppStore site.

If my thesis holds true, then Microsoft should exploit the installed base of Office users, which should enable Windows Mobile to gain market share globally. Microsoft has other assets including Windows Media Player, Xbox and the assets from acquiring Danger. Microsoft should leverage the interoperation and integration with those assets. The promise of Windows Mobile-based smartphones should be seamless interoperation with the Office desktop environment and the Xbox gaming environment.

(more…)

Google willing to share mobile ad revenue with operators

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

Google willing to share mobile ad revenue with operators

Google has been so busy tweaking service providers of late, it seems, it’s easy to forget they make a good mobile partner as well.

The new Google Adsense for Mobile Search delivers a Google-hosted search box that mobile operators – and content providers too – can brand and place on their mobile portals. Google handles all the heavy lifting while also enabling the box to be co-branded by the mobile operator. For the effort, it shares ad revenue with the carrier, Google said in a blog post.

The service is just now entering beta testing, and Google invited interested mobile operators to get a private meeting for a briefing on the offering at Mobile World Congress. Interested operators can fill out a form to request a meeting.

(more…)