Archive for July, 2009

Review: T-Mobile’s latest phone with Google’s Android software is better, but far from perfect

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Review: T-Mobile’s latest phone with Google’s Android software is better, but far from perfect

Less than a year after T-Mobile and HTC released the first smart phone using Google’s Android operating system, the wireless operator and the handset maker are back with a sleeker device that takes advantage of recent software updates.

The myTouch 3G has plenty of hardware and software kinks — and a $200 price tag that’s $50 higher than the predecessor, the G1, both with a two-year contract. But advances to the operating system may draw a smattering of cheers.

The myTouch, which goes on sale Aug. 5, looks similar to the G1, but replaces the bulk of its predecessor’s slide-out keyboard with a slimmer, lighter frame that sports a touch-screen keyboard like that of the iPhone. Its face is still dominated by a long screen, but it has a few more buttons below the screen, including one that offers a shortcut to Google’s search engine.

Besides being lighter, the myTouch has better battery life than the G1. It’s rated for up to seven hours of talk time, two more than the older phone, and it had no trouble lasting through a day of use that included talking, listening to music, surfing the Web and checking e-mail.

It is also zippier overall thanks to the Android 1.5 software, which T-Mobile began rolling out to G1 users as well in May.

Taking photos on the G1 using the first iteration of Android was often sluggish and painful, as you never knew when the shutter would finally click. It’s faster on the myTouch, though still slower than it should be.

You can also take videos now, something I could do on the G1 before the software update with a less-than-impressive third-party application, and there’s a quick link for budding auteurs to upload them to Google’s video-sharing site YouTube.

One helpful new feature specific to the myTouch is the ability to check work e-mail through Microsoft Exchange. This could make the handset more attractive to business users who want round-the-clock access to both their personal and work e-mail accounts on the same device.

I liked Google’s voice search, accessible by holding down myTouch’s search button or by swiping the touch screen to the left to reveal a virtual button. It worked impressively well when I commanded it to find sites on “bacon salt” and “best tacos in San Francisco.” The only time it slipped up was when I tried something silly — “alligator french fries” — and it thought I was looking for eBay.

There are numerous issues with the software though, the biggest of which concerns the touch-screen keyboard, a new feature in Android 1.5 that made me wish the myTouch had a slim slide-out bottom keyboard like Palm’s Pre.

When holding the phone upright, the myTouch keyboard felt too cramped, even for my somewhat-small digits. And when holding it sideways, I still frequently hit incorrect keys. It also seemed to take me much longer to tap out an instant message or e-mail than it does when I use a smart phone keyboard with real keys.

Like most handsets, the myTouch can suggest words and correct common typing errors, but these didn’t speed me up. Rather, I sent out a few silly messages to friends without realizing it — apparently the myTouch was “correcting” some of my slang — then had to resend the words I’d meant to express.

(more…)

Review: Microsoft’s Bing has a smart presentation, but still far from Google in key ways

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Review: Microsoft’s Bing has a smart presentation, but still far from Google in key ways

Is Microsoft’s Bing really a better search engine? Since it debuted last month, it has earned praise for the smart way it presents results and how it lets users preview Web sites without clicking through to them.

Yet a closer look at its results reveals why loyal Yahoo users may not end up happy with the deal the company announced Wednesday, which calls for Bing to replace Yahoo Search.

ComScore Inc. says 19.6 percent of Web users go to Yahoo for their searches. Microsoft draws fewer, at 8.4 percent. That’s up just slighly from the 8 percent it captured before Bing launched at the start of June. It didn’t make a dent in Google’s commanding 65 percent market share.

I think I can see why. Not only is using Google such an ingrained habit that we talk of “googling” something, but also its technology is better in some key ways. I found Bing to be less comprehensive than Google and, surprisingly, Yahoo Search. It simply returns fewer results for a lot of search terms.

With common terms like “cars,” all the search engines return oodles of results. Yahoo reports 2.56 billion pages with that term. It doesn’t matter so much how many pages they report, as long as they give relevant results, and all do.

Then I tried to hunt for something purposely obscure, like background on the country manor that my sister is interested in buying. Google gave me 46 links, Yahoo 15. Bing supplied just six.

Of course, even in this kind of query you might not have time to look through every link. So if Bing has six and they’re good, that’s fine.

Yet in the country manor search and other cases, often at the fringes of what you’d expect the Internet to know, I found the most relevant results in Google and Yahoo only.

Years ago, search engines competed by citing their “index size” — basically, how many pages they had collected in their database. Google played this game too. But as Google grew to dominate the scene by presenting better results, Web users lost interest in the statistics. Google doesn’t make a big point of them anymore either, though it did say last year that it had more than 1 trillion Web pages catalogued.

Looking at results from Bing, it may be time to care about search index size again. That’s especially the case because in other respects, the top three engines are so similar as to be nearly indistinguishable. Nos. 2 and 3 have basically copied Google.

(more…)

Ganging up with Google Android against Apple’s iPhone

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Ganging up with Google Android against Apple’s iPhone

Apple is currently king of the smartphone world. The iconic iPhone has doubled in market share since 2008, rising to 10.8 percent in the first quarter of 2009 from 5.3 percent in 2008, according to Gartner.

But Apple may be in for a Microsoft moment. Just as a steady stream of well-heeled competitors like IBM, Red Hat, and Oracle are aligning themselves with Linux as a way to undermine Windows in servers and desktops, so, too, are crowds starting to form around Google’s open-source Android in the smartphone market.

Linux: the bete noir of proprietary operating system vendors.

Samsung, LG, Motorola, and others are placing increasing stakes on Android. Indeed, BusinessWeek reports that Motorola has “one bullet left in its gun” and this bullet is Android. It can’t afford to let the “iPhone killer” draw blanks. “Motorola’s handset business depends on Android,” as ZDNet’s Larry Dignan suggests.

Importantly, Android is growing in the area that defines the iPhone’s success more than anything else: applications. BusinessWeek’s Stephen Wildstrom says that “Android is now a contender” in large part due to its growing array of third-party applications:

The Android Market is surprisingly well-stocked, considering the relatively small number of Android phones in use….[W]ith support from Google and from handset makers desperate to come up with something that can mount a serious challenge to the iPhone, Android could become a major player.

(more…)

OpenHosting Releases OpenVPS/KVM Platform

Friday, July 31st, 2009

OpenHosting Releases OpenVPS/KVM Platform

Linux VPS provider OpenHosting (www.openhosting.com) announced on Wednesday it has released OpenVPS/KVM, a commercial hosting version of its new virtual private server product based on Red Hat’s Linux KVM.

OpenVPS/KVM is designed to give all customers access to enterprise grade, open source solutions.

As the latest virtualized technology to be added to Linux, KVM, or Kernel Virtual Machine, is considered “superior to all other full virtualization technologies,” according to the company.

The technology combines support for the latest hardware virtualization capabilities with the rapid feature development of the Linux kernel to create a functional, virtualization platform.

Currently, KVM is the only virtualization technology that is fully incorporated into the Linux kernel. And with Red Hat’s acquisition of KVM-developer Qumranet, KVM is supported by the long term by the leading Linux distribution provider, as well as the entire Linux community.

(more…)

CentOS Linux developers threaten mutiny

Friday, July 31st, 2009

CentOS Linux developers threaten mutiny

Offering a free clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux turned out not to be such a simple matter after all.

The CentOS project aims to reproduce Red Hat’s tested, supported, and certified version of the operating system, without its per-server subscription fees. Because RHEL is open-source software, it’s theoretically possible for an outsider to select the same software packages, apply the same patches, and produce a version of the Linux product that works the same.

But several lead programmers in the project went public on Thursday with complaints that CentOS founder Lance Davis is threatening the project with his reclusive ways. They also raise the prospect of mutiny, in effect, if Davis doesn’t respond.

“You seem to have crawled into a hole, and this is not acceptable,” the programmers wrote. “Please do not kill CentOS through your fear of shared management of the project. Clearly the project dies if all the developers walk away.”

Conventional proprietary software products are hardly immune to problems such as corporate owners going out of business or canceling products. But the CentOS situation shows that the informal, free-wheeling ways common in the open-source realm can have their own pitfalls. To be fair, though, many open-source projects also have formal controls such as foundations and governance committees.

The open letter, augmented by several individual blog postings, was published Thursday on the CentOS mailing list and Web site. Authors include Russ Herrold, Ralph Angenendt, Karanbir Singh, Tim Verhoeven, and several other members of the CentOS development team.

Davis didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The authors object that Davis maintains sole control over the CentOS.org Internet domain and IRC chat channel. And Dag Wieers, who works on the security, Web, and infrastructure aspects of CentOS, is among those concerned about money paid to the project through Google AdSense ads, Web site sponsorship, and users’ donations through PayPal.

“For at least three years people were donating money and sponsors were paying for Web site ads while the money was not flowing into the project. Where it went to I can only guess,” he said in a blog post. “Once the financial issues are resolved, there is a lot of work to turn the project into a real community project that can release even when one person is out of office, that is owned by a foundation, and that makes the best use of the power of its the community.”

(more…)