Archive for September, 2008

THE G1 PHONE – GOOGLE’S ANDROID DEBUT

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

THE G1 PHONE – GOOGLE’S ANDROID DEBUT

Google has a phone? You better believe it. The Manifest Destiny of Google continues to expand.

The HTC Dream, the first phone featuring Google’s Android operating system, will be sold in the U.S. starting in October. The G1 phone is only available to T-Mobile, priced at $179 with a two-year contract. However, this will be the first of many phones to come with Google’s Android operating system. We suggest you wait.

(more…)

Analysts: Google Maps wins, rivals ‘stagnate’

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Analysts: Google Maps wins, rivals ‘stagnate’

Google Maps has expanded its lead in features in the last year, a move that will help the company vanquish rival services in mobile search, Cowen and Co. analysts said Monday.

“Since our initial survey in July 2007, innovation at (AOL’s) MapQuest and Yahoo Maps has stagnated,” and although Microsoft has improved Live Search Maps, it remains the least popular of the four top services, said analysts Jim Friedland and Kevin Kopelman. “Yahoo and MapQuest do not have the resources to keep pace and are forced to aggressively monetize a declining franchise in the maps segment.”

(more…)

Chrome – faster and better than IE

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Chrome – faster and better than IE

The buzz the past few weeks has been the new browser from Google, mysteriously named Chrome.

While it might seem weird for a search engine company to enter into the fiercely competitive browser market, presently dominated by the worst browser on the planet Internet Explorer there is a method behind Google’s madness.

People don’t realise that Google has been a thorn in Microsoft’s side for at least the last couple of years.

You may know that Microsoft tried to buy Yahoo, who turned down the offer of obscene amounts of money to keep doing whatever it is they do at Yahoo. And Microsoft already has a search engine, the underwhelming MSN.

My guess is Microsoft wanted to leverage Yahoo as well so they could go head to head with Google and try for a slice of the billion-dollar search engine scene.

The thing is that Microsoft, while generally acknowledged as being adequate at building operating systems, servers and office suites, is totally naff at everything else.

It seems to think that with enough brains, brawn and money, everything it does will turn to gold.

Microsoft is wrong as anyone who has tried to use Microsoft’s website will attest. It is, and always has been, an absolute horror to navigate.

This is because Microsoft have a way of doing things that is almost deliberately at odds with the way everyone else does things, their philosophy being that we should change to conform to their standards. This “wag the dog” approach is what sends some people into tailspins.

Imagine heavy-hitters from all the big organisations meeting over skim-milk lattes and creating standards that everyone agrees to adhere to.

Microsoft flatly refuses to accept this standard because they have their own way of doing the same thing. Um, no.

(more…)

Fixing Microsoft: A How-To Guide

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Fixing Microsoft: A How-To Guide

The company is losing ground to Google. It’s time to pay attention to issues of privacy, security — and simplifying things for PC users

Other than another profitable quarter, Microsoft (MSFT) has little to celebrate these days. The company is falling sadly behind, serving fewer ads, video clips, search results, or personal Web pages than rival Google (GOOG). Microsoft’s $300 million ad campaign humanized Bill Gates but left consumers wondering, Where’s the beef? The company can’t even seem to buy up competitors [Yahoo! (YHOO), anyone?].

(more…)

The iPhone App Store: Backlash to the Backlash

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

The iPhone App Store: Backlash to the Backlash

We’ve pretty steadily followed the conventional wisdom regarding comparisons between Apple’s extremely closed iPhone app store, especially when compared to Google’s promised mostly open Android app store. This is an important topic, as the app stores are wonderful start-up terrain. We’ve criticized Apple’s heavy-handed and capricious stewardship, while praising Google’s decision to open up the store, exercising minimal prior restraint on prospective applications. (The T-Mobile G1, the first phone to run Android, comes out October 22.)

But fairness dictates that we present the alternate viewpoint, which has recently been articulated on TechCrunch and on our sister site Slate.

The TechCrunch post, by Dan Kimerling, is less a theoretical defense of Apple’s policies and more an instruction to developers to quit whining. “When you create the platform, you set the rules,” Kimerling writes. “If Apple wants to restrict iPhone applications to those that do not compete with features built into the iPhone, well, they can go right ahead and do so.” Well, yes, but no one’s really arguing otherwise. Few say Apple can’t do what it’s doing; they say it shouldn’t.

Kimerling is more persuasive when he points out that Apple can afford to do what it wants with its app store because developers, eyeing the 14 million (and rapidly increasing) iPhones and the iPhone’s superior platform and storage space, will continue to develop for the iPhone because the opportunity is too great to worry too much about Apple’s strict patrolling of its app store. This is a useful, realistic corrective to the notion that Apple’s behavior genuinely endangers the iPhone’s dominance, at least in the short-term. Still, it is the luxury of pundits to tell the world what it’s doing wrong, and Kimerling fails to persuade that pundits shouldn’t continue to tell Apple to loosen its app store.

(more…)